linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1628308278.23588.3.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Sat, 7 Aug 2021 11:51:18 +0800
From:   Hsin-hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@...iatek.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT8195

Hi,
sorry for missing other comments, I will confirm it internally and
update it.

Thanks a lot.

On Fri, 2021-08-06 at 10:49 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2021-08-02 23:34:20)
> > From: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Add spmi support for MT8195.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> Missing Signed-off-by from hsin-hsiung.wang here
> 
> > ---
> > changes since v9:
> > - No change.
> > ---
> >  drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> > index 94c45d46ab0c..0c320801c9d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> > @@ -348,6 +427,14 @@ static const struct pmif_data mt6873_pmif_arb = {
> >         .soc_chan = 2,
> >  };
> >  
> > +static const struct pmif_data mt8195_pmif_arb[] = {
> 
> This is an array of type pmif_data.
> 
> > +       {
> > +               .regs = mt8195_regs,
> > +               .spmimst_regs = mt8195_spmi_regs,
> > +               .soc_chan = 2,
> > +       },
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >         struct pmif *arb;
> > @@ -444,6 +531,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id mtk_spmi_match_table[] = {
> >         {
> >                 .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi",
> >                 .data = &mt6873_pmif_arb,
> 
> mt6873_pmif_arb is not an array, see the context header above.
> 
> How does this work? Has this been tested?
> 
> > +       }, {
> > +               .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-spmi",
> > +               .data = &mt8195_pmif_arb,
> >         }, {
> >                 /* sentinel */
> >         },
> > -- 
> > 2.18.0
> >