[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2021 11:40:30 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Fix masking for high freq counters
On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 02:14:35 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com> wrote:
> The only other sane idea that I could come up with is providing this
> information to the kernel through DT, although that would leave ACPI
> systems behind.
It also has the disadvantage that a large number of DT timer nodes are
a mess of cargo-culted, copy-pasted idioms, and that adding another
property would only make it worse. I'm more confident with something
that can be either:
- checked from EL2 using CNTVOFF, which is complicated, doesn't work
at EL1, and leaves us in a weird state if we have different counter
width views in the system (BL is such a wonderful concept)
- or computed from first principle based on the requirements of the
architecture.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists