[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6324362-1439-ef94-789b-5934c0e1cdb8@amd.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 23:11:40 -0500
From: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
To: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com,
wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Allow CPU to force vendor-specific TDP
level
On 8/8/21 10:58 PM, Yu Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 02:26:56PM -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
>> AMD future CPUs will require a 5-level NPT if host CR4.LA57 is set.
>
> Sorry, but why? NPT is not indexed by HVA.
NPT is not indexed by HVA - it is always indexed by GPA. What I meant is
NPT page table level has to be the same as the host OS page table: if
5-level page table is enabled in host OS (CR4.LA57=1), guest NPT has to
5-level too.
>
>> To prevent kvm_mmu_get_tdp_level() from incorrectly changing NPT level
>> on behalf of CPUs, add a new parameter in kvm_configure_mmu() to force
>> a fixed TDP level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 ++---
>> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 10 ++++++++--
>> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 4 +++-
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 ++-
>> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 974cbfb1eefe..6d16f75cc8da 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -723,7 +723,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>>
>> u64 reserved_gpa_bits;
>> int maxphyaddr;
>> - int max_tdp_level;
>>
>> /* emulate context */
>>
>> @@ -1747,8 +1746,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_invalidate_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *mmu,
>> void kvm_mmu_invpcid_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, unsigned long pcid);
>> void kvm_mmu_new_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t new_pgd);
>>
>> -void kvm_configure_mmu(bool enable_tdp, int tdp_max_root_level,
>> - int tdp_huge_page_level);
>> +void kvm_configure_mmu(bool enable_tdp, int tdp_forced_root_level,
>> + int tdp_max_root_level, int tdp_huge_page_level);
>>
>> static inline u16 kvm_read_ldt(void)
>> {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> index 66f7f5bc3482..c11ee4531f6d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ module_param_named(flush_on_reuse, force_flush_and_sync_on_reuse, bool, 0644);
>> bool tdp_enabled = false;
>>
>> static int max_huge_page_level __read_mostly;
>> +static int tdp_root_level __read_mostly;
>
> I think this is a broken design - meaning KVM can only use 5-level or
> 4-level NPT for all VMs.
Broken normally means non-functional or buggy, which doesn't apply here.
A good TLB design should be able to offset the potential overhead of
5-level page table for most cases.
>
> B.R.
> Yu
>
>> static int max_tdp_level __read_mostly;
>>
>> enum {
>> @@ -4562,6 +4563,10 @@ static union kvm_mmu_role kvm_calc_mmu_role_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>
>> static inline int kvm_mmu_get_tdp_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> + /* tdp_root_level is architecture forced level, use it if nonzero */
>> + if (tdp_root_level)
>> + return tdp_root_level;
>> +
>> /* Use 5-level TDP if and only if it's useful/necessary. */
>> if (max_tdp_level == 5 && cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu) <= 48)
>> return 4;
>> @@ -5253,10 +5258,11 @@ void kvm_mmu_invpcid_gva(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, unsigned long pcid)
>> */
>> }
>>
>> -void kvm_configure_mmu(bool enable_tdp, int tdp_max_root_level,
>> - int tdp_huge_page_level)
>> +void kvm_configure_mmu(bool enable_tdp, int tdp_forced_root_level,
>> + int tdp_max_root_level, int tdp_huge_page_level)
>> {
>> tdp_enabled = enable_tdp;
>> + tdp_root_level = tdp_forced_root_level;
>> max_tdp_level = tdp_max_root_level;
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> index e8ccab50ebf6..f361d466e18e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
>> @@ -1015,7 +1015,9 @@ static __init int svm_hardware_setup(void)
>> if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NPT))
>> npt_enabled = false;
>>
>> - kvm_configure_mmu(npt_enabled, get_max_npt_level(), PG_LEVEL_1G);
>> + /* Force VM NPT level equal to the host's max NPT level */
>> + kvm_configure_mmu(npt_enabled, get_max_npt_level(),
>> + get_max_npt_level(), PG_LEVEL_1G);
>> pr_info("kvm: Nested Paging %sabled\n", npt_enabled ? "en" : "dis");
>>
>> /* Note, SEV setup consumes npt_enabled. */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 927a552393b9..034e1397c7d5 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -7803,7 +7803,8 @@ static __init int hardware_setup(void)
>> ept_lpage_level = PG_LEVEL_2M;
>> else
>> ept_lpage_level = PG_LEVEL_4K;
>> - kvm_configure_mmu(enable_ept, vmx_get_max_tdp_level(), ept_lpage_level);
>> + kvm_configure_mmu(enable_ept, 0, vmx_get_max_tdp_level(),
>> + ept_lpage_level);
>>
>> /*
>> * Only enable PML when hardware supports PML feature, and both EPT
>> --
>> 2.31.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists