[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2a4dd1d-c1ac-876b-4a3-c5ea7555498@google.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2021 21:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/15] Make MAX_ORDER adjustable as a kernel boot
time parameter.
On Sat, 7 Aug 2021, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I am, however, of the opinion that 2MB pages give us so much trouble
> because they're so very special. Few people exercise those code paths and
> it's easy to break them without noticing. This is partly why I want to
> do arbitrary-order pages. If everybody is running with compound pages
> all the time, we'll see the corner cases often, and people other than
> Hugh, Kirill and Mike will be able to work on them.
I don't entirely agree. I'm all for your use of compound pages in page
cache, but don't think its problems are representative of the problems
in aiming for a PMD (or PUD) bar, with the weird page table transitions
we expect of "THP" there.
I haven't checked: is your use of compound pages in page cache still
limited to the HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE architectures? When
the others could just as well use compound pages in page cache too.
Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists