[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c09fc86d-1e6a-3315-7489-9e269935ba55@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:20:05 +0800
From: Xianting TIan <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang3@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: add ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN support
在 2021/8/9 上午12:30, Jisheng Zhang 写道:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2021 22:55:37 +0800
> Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> Introduce ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to riscv arch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
>> index 9b58b1045..2945bbe2b 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cache.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>>
>> #define L1_CACHE_BYTES (1 << L1_CACHE_SHIFT)
>>
>> +#define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN L1_CACHE_BYTES
> It's not a good idea to blindly set this for all riscv. For "coherent"
> platforms, this is not necessary and will waste memory.
I checked ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN definition, "If an architecture isn't fully
DMA-coherent, ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN must be set".
so that the memory allocator makes sure that kmalloc'ed buffer doesn't
share a cache line with the others.
Documentation/core-api/dma-api-howto.rst
2) ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
Architectures must ensure that kmalloc'ed buffer is
DMA-safe. Drivers and subsystems depend on it. If an architecture
isn't fully DMA-coherent (i.e. hardware doesn't ensure that data in
the CPU cache is identical to data in main memory),
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN must be set so that the memory allocator
makes sure that kmalloc'ed buffer doesn't share a cache line with
the others. See arch/arm/include/asm/cache.h as an example.
Note that ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is about DMA memory alignment
constraints. You don't need to worry about the architecture data
alignment constraints (e.g. the alignment constraints about 64-bit
objects).
>
>> +
>> /*
>> * RISC-V requires the stack pointer to be 16-byte aligned, so ensure that
>> * the flat loader aligns it accordingly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists