linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] mtk-mdp: add driver to probe mdp components

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:53:32 +0200
From:   Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
To:     Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenst@...omium.org,
        houlong.wei@...iatek.com, yong.wu@...iatek.com,
        enric.balletbo@...labora.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
        Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] mtk-mdp: add driver to probe mdp components



On 09.08.21 05:23, Eizan Miyamoto wrote:
> Hi Dafna,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 4:40 PM Dafna Hirschfeld
> <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com> wrote:
>>> +int mtk_mdp_comp_init(struct mtk_mdp_comp *comp, struct device *dev)
>>
>> This function can be static
> 
> If it's all the same to you, are you okay for me to make this change either:
> - If upstream requests changes be made to this series, I will include
> this suggestion
> - If the series is accepted as-is, I will make a follow-up patch
> 
> This is to reduce workload on reviewers having to re-ack changes for
> (what I hope you agree is) a nit.

I think you can keep the review-by tag of the reviewers since this is just a nit.
So sending a new version won't need a re-ack from the reviewers.

You can send it also as a separate patch. I don't care too much.

> 
> If you don't agree, I will happily oblige and make the change and
> upload a new version of the series.
> 
>>>        for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(comp->clk); i++) {
>>>                comp->clk[i] = of_clk_get(node, i);
>>
>> that iteration can be replaced with clk_bulk_get
> 
> As per Enric's suggestion in response to "propagate errors from
> clock_on" in this series, are you okay for me to make the change in a
> follow-up patch?

yes,

Thanks,
Dafna

> 
> Thanks again for your review,
> 
> Eizan
>