[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJk_X9jT7bqLn-wb7AGF6onA2qE9_D_=f4pPpGDEoiCar2BWUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:45:16 +0900
From: Jeaho Hwang <jhhwang@...t.co.kr>
To: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
변무광(Byeon Moo Kwang)/자동화연)Automation Platform연구팀 <mkbyeon@...lectric.co.kr>,
Linux team <team-linux@...t.co.kr>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Chipidea USB device goes infinite loop due to interrupt while hw_ep_prime
2021년 8월 9일 (월) 오전 10:27, Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>님이 작성:
>
> On 21-08-04 11:03:44, Jeaho Hwang wrote:
> > Hi. linux-usb and linux-rt experts.
> > >
> > > On 21-08-02 17:35:01, Jeaho Hwang wrote:
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > We found an infinite loop inside the function hw_ep_set_halt
> > > > (drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c) if a cablle is repeatedly
> > > > connnected/disconnected while ping through RNDIS with chipidea USB device.
> > > >
> > > > Using ftrace tracing, we found that hw_ep_set_halt is called due to error
> > > > return of hw_ep_prime(drivers/usb/chipidea/udc.c:202) which is called from
> > > > isr_tr_complete_handler -> isr_setup_status_phase -> _ep_queue.
> > > >
> > > > The comment of function hw_ep_prime says (execute without interruption) but
> > > > timer interrupt is occurred while hw_ep_prime is executing. We believe that
> > > > the interrupt causes an error return of hw_ep_prime. We tried to protect
> > > > hw_ep_prime from irqs and then no case of the infinite loop is occurred.
> > > >
> > > > I want ask if it is appropriate way that turning off irq inside (threaded)
> > > > irq handlers. And should we explicitly turn off irqs before calling
> > > > hw_ep_prime?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Jeaho, do you use RT-Linux or standard Linux? The function hw_ep_prime is
> > > only called at udc_irq which is registered as top-half irq handlers.
> > > Why the timer interrupt is occurred when hw_ep_prime is executing?
> >
> > We use preempt_RT so timer interrupt could be occurred. Now I found
> > out that forced threaded irq handler disables local irq on standard
> > linux so It is a linux-rt issue. Then should I make patch which
> > disables local irqs during hw_ep_prime for RT kernel and suggest it to
> > linux-rt maintainers?
> >
> > Thanks for a kind answer Peter.
> >
>
Thanks Peter.
> No, that will lead to deadlock since the normal request queue API function
> ep_queue disables irq which also calls into hw_ep_prime.
ep_queue disables irq by calling spin_lock_irqsave but it actually
does not disable irq for RT kernel.
Therefore local_irq_save at hw_ep_prime would not cause deadlock if
ep_queue calls it, i think.
Is it anything wrong?
>
> For RT kernel, you may try to disable local irq at isr_setup_status_phase.
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Peter Chen
>
--
황재호, Jay Hwang, linux team manager of RTst
010-7242-1593
Powered by blists - more mailing lists