[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRDxTodNNqtnpPpn@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:11:42 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] usb: xhci-mtk: handle bandwidth table rollover
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 04:59:29PM +0800, Ikjoon Jang wrote:
> xhci-mtk has 64 slots for periodic bandwidth calculations and each
> slot represents byte budgets on a microframe. When an endpoint's
> allocation sits on the boundary of the table, byte budgets' slot
> should be rolled over but the current implementation doesn't.
>
> This patch applies a 6 bits mask to the microframe index to handle
> its rollover 64 slots and prevent out-of-bounds array access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk-sch.c | 79 +++++++++------------------------
> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mtk.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
Why is this "RFC"? What needs to be addressed in this change before it
can be accepted?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists