[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOak1e8n6JpNKODfM57OTtbCNz8UBbj+wefwipVWP_Ep6SHmHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 13:23:37 +1000
From: Eizan Miyamoto <eizan@...gle.com>
To: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wenst@...omium.org,
houlong.wei@...iatek.com, yong.wu@...iatek.com,
enric.balletbo@...labora.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
chunkuang.hu@...nel.org,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] mtk-mdp: add driver to probe mdp components
Hi Dafna,
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 4:40 PM Dafna Hirschfeld
<dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com> wrote:
> > +int mtk_mdp_comp_init(struct mtk_mdp_comp *comp, struct device *dev)
>
> This function can be static
If it's all the same to you, are you okay for me to make this change either:
- If upstream requests changes be made to this series, I will include
this suggestion
- If the series is accepted as-is, I will make a follow-up patch
This is to reduce workload on reviewers having to re-ack changes for
(what I hope you agree is) a nit.
If you don't agree, I will happily oblige and make the change and
upload a new version of the series.
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(comp->clk); i++) {
> > comp->clk[i] = of_clk_get(node, i);
>
> that iteration can be replaced with clk_bulk_get
As per Enric's suggestion in response to "propagate errors from
clock_on" in this series, are you okay for me to make the change in a
follow-up patch?
Thanks again for your review,
Eizan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists