[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8c08a61-63bc-aa34-6045-ccfdc3983e6a@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 08:49:16 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
christian.koenig@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Fix a few typos in dma-buf documentation
On 8/9/21 5:22 AM, Gal Pressman wrote:
> Fix a few typos in the documentation:
> - Remove an extraneous 'or'
> - 'unpins' -> 'unpin'
> - 'braket' -> 'bracket'
> - 'mappinsg' -> 'mappings'
> - 'fullfills' -> 'fulfills'
>
> Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Thanks.
> ---
> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index efdc56b9d95f..772403352767 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> * device), and otherwise need to fail the attach operation.
> *
> * The exporter should also in general check whether the current
> - * allocation fullfills the DMA constraints of the new device. If this
> + * allocation fulfills the DMA constraints of the new device. If this
> * is not the case, and the allocation cannot be moved, it should also
> * fail the attach operation.
> *
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> *
> * Returns:
> *
> - * A &sg_table scatter list of or the backing storage of the DMA buffer,
> + * A &sg_table scatter list of the backing storage of the DMA buffer,
> * already mapped into the device address space of the &device attached
> * with the provided &dma_buf_attachment. The addresses and lengths in
> * the scatter list are PAGE_SIZE aligned.
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> *
> * This is called by dma_buf_unmap_attachment() and should unmap and
> * release the &sg_table allocated in @map_dma_buf, and it is mandatory.
> - * For static dma_buf handling this might also unpins the backing
> + * For static dma_buf handling this might also unpin the backing
> * storage if this is the last mapping of the DMA buffer.
> */
> void (*unmap_dma_buf)(struct dma_buf_attachment *,
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> * This callback is used by the dma_buf_mmap() function
> *
> * Note that the mapping needs to be incoherent, userspace is expected
> - * to braket CPU access using the DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC interface.
> + * to bracket CPU access using the DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC interface.
> *
> * Because dma-buf buffers have invariant size over their lifetime, the
> * dma-buf core checks whether a vma is too large and rejects such
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static inline bool dma_buf_is_dynamic(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>
> /**
> * dma_buf_attachment_is_dynamic - check if a DMA-buf attachment uses dynamic
> - * mappinsg
> + * mappings
> * @attach: the DMA-buf attachment to check
> *
> * Returns true if a DMA-buf importer wants to call the map/unmap functions with
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists