lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 10:18:58 -0700 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>, Len Baker <len.baker@....com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drivers/edac/edac_mc: Remove all strcpy() uses On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 12:05 +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > On 08.08.21 13:26:17, Len Baker wrote: > > > > Perhaps this should use scnprintf rather than strscpy > > > Something like: > > > n += scnprintf(buf + n, len - n, "%s", > > > p == e->label ? dim->label : OTHER_LABEL); > > > > > In the first version [1] the scnprintf was used but Robert Richter don't > > see any benefit compared with the current implementation. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/20210725162954.9861-1-len.baker@gmx.com/ > > Reason is that there is the assumption that p must always point at the > end of the string and its trailing zero byte. I am not opposed using > the string function's return code instead of strlen() to get the > length. But why using formated output if strscpy() can be used? strscpy and scnprintf have different return values and it's simpler and much more common to use scnprintf for appended strings that are limited to a specific buffer length.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists