linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 78/85] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest result

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210810172950.866385030@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:30:51 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 78/85] bpf, selftests: Adjust few selftest result_unpriv outcomes

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit 1bad6fd52be4ce12d207e2820ceb0f29ab31fc53 upstream.

Given we don't need to simulate the speculative domain for registers with
immediates anymore since the verifier uses direct imm-based rewrites instead
of having to mask, we can also lift a few cases that were previously rejected.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
[OP: backport to 5.4, small context adjustment in stack_ptr.c]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c       |    2 --
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c |    8 --------
 2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/stack_ptr.c
@@ -291,8 +291,6 @@
 	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
 	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	},
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "invalid stack off=0 size=1",
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.retval = 42,
 },
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c
@@ -301,8 +301,6 @@
 	},
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 1,
 },
 {
@@ -372,8 +370,6 @@
 	},
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 1,
 },
 {
@@ -473,8 +469,6 @@
 	},
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 1,
 },
 {
@@ -767,8 +761,6 @@
 	},
 	.fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 },
 	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
 	.retval = 1,
 },
 {