linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 004/135] net: xfrm: fix memory leak in xfrm_user_rcv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210810172955.821047403@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:28:58 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        syzbot+fb347cf82c73a90efcca@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 004/135] net: xfrm: fix memory leak in xfrm_user_rcv_msg

From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 7c1a80e80cde008f271bae630d28cf684351e807 ]

Syzbot reported memory leak in xfrm_user_rcv_msg(). The
problem was is non-freed skb's frag_list.

In skb_release_all() skb_release_data() will be called only
in case of skb->head != NULL, but netlink_skb_destructor()
sets head to NULL. So, allocated frag_list skb should be
freed manualy, since consume_skb() won't take care of it

Fixes: 5106f4a8acff ("xfrm/compat: Add 32=>64-bit messages translator")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+fb347cf82c73a90efcca@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 45f86a97eaf2..6f97665b632e 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2751,6 +2751,16 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
 	err = link->doit(skb, nlh, attrs);
 
+	/* We need to free skb allocated in xfrm_alloc_compat() before
+	 * returning from this function, because consume_skb() won't take
+	 * care of frag_list since netlink destructor sets
+	 * sbk->head to NULL. (see netlink_skb_destructor())
+	 */
+	if (skb_has_frag_list(skb)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list);
+		skb_shinfo(skb)->frag_list = NULL;
+	}
+
 err:
 	kvfree(nlh64);
 	return err;
-- 
2.30.2