linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 119/135] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpmh: Ensure floor BW is enforced for all nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210810172959.841577238@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 19:30:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>,
        Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 119/135] interconnect: qcom: icc-rpmh: Ensure floor BW is enforced for all nodes

From: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>

commit ce5a595744126be4f1327e29e3c5ae9aac6b38d5 upstream.

We currently only enforce BW floors for a subset of nodes in a path.
All BCMs that need updating are queued in the pre_aggregate/aggregate
phase. The first set() commits all queued BCMs and subsequent set()
calls short-circuit without committing anything. Since the floor BW
isn't set in sum_avg/max_peak until set(), then some BCMs are committed
before their associated nodes reflect the floor.

Set the floor as each node is being aggregated. This ensures that all
all relevant floors are set before the BCMs are committed.

Fixes: 266cd33b5913 ("interconnect: qcom: Ensure that the floor bandwidth value is enforced")
Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <mdtipton@...eaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210721175432.2119-4-mdtipton@codeaurora.org
[georgi: Removed unused variable]
Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <djakov@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
+++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpmh.c
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@ int qcom_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *
 			qn->sum_avg[i] += avg_bw;
 			qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u32, qn->max_peak[i], peak_bw);
 		}
+
+		if (node->init_avg || node->init_peak) {
+			qn->sum_avg[i] = max_t(u64, qn->sum_avg[i], node->init_avg);
+			qn->max_peak[i] = max_t(u64, qn->max_peak[i], node->init_peak);
+		}
 	}
 
 	*agg_avg += avg_bw;
@@ -79,7 +84,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_icc_aggregate);
 int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
 {
 	struct qcom_icc_provider *qp;
-	struct qcom_icc_node *qn;
 	struct icc_node *node;
 
 	if (!src)
@@ -88,12 +92,6 @@ int qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, s
 		node = src;
 
 	qp = to_qcom_provider(node->provider);
-	qn = node->data;
-
-	qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64, qn->sum_avg[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
-						 node->avg_bw);
-	qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC] = max_t(u64, qn->max_peak[QCOM_ICC_BUCKET_AMC],
-						  node->peak_bw);
 
 	qcom_icc_bcm_voter_commit(qp->voter);