lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <583beba4-2595-5f4c-49a8-f8d999f0ebe7@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:50:29 -0700 From: Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@...cle.com> To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, syzbot <syzbot+8760ca6c1ee783ac4abd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>, Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, kpsingh@...nel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> Subject: Re: [syzbot] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in _copy_to_iter On 8/10/21 2:19 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On 8/9/21 10:31 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: >> On 8/9/21 1:09 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> I am guessing that even your test would trigger the warning, >>> if you make sure to include CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y in your kernel build. >> Eric, >> >> Thanks for the pointer, have you ever over looked at something when coding? >> > I _think_ I was trying to help, not shaming you in any way. How did the previous email help? I did not get any reply when I asked what could be the cause. > > My question about spinlock/mutex was not sarcastic, you authored > 6 official linux patches, there is no evidence for linux kernel expertise. That is no measure of someones understanding. There are other OS's as well. I have worked on Solaris and other *unix* OS's for over 20+ years. This was an oversight on my part and I apologize, but instead of questioning my expertise it would have been helpful to say what might have caused it. Shoaib
Powered by blists - more mailing lists