[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRLIpQIVgieYo1yc@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:42:45 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net: phy: nxp-tja11xx: log critical health
state
> > I'm not so happy abusing the statistic counters like this. Especially
> > when we have a better API for temperature and voltage: hwmon.
> >
> > phy_temp_warn maps to hwmon_temp_max_alarm. phy_temp_high maps to
> > either hwmon_temp_crit_alarm or hwmon_temp_emergency_alarm.
> >
> > The under voltage maps to hwmon_in_lcrit_alarm.
> >
>
> FWIW, the statistics counters in this driver are already abused
> (phy_polarity_detect, phy_open_detect, phy_short_detect), so
> I am not sure if adding more abuse makes a difference (and/or
> if such abuse is common for phy drivers in general).
Hi Guenter
Abuse is not common in general. I think this is the only driver
abusing stats to return flags. At the time those where added, we did
not have phy cable test support. Now we do, i would also suggest that
the driver makes use of that infrastructure to issue a cable test
report. These 'stats' need to stay, since they are ABI, but we should
not add more.
That is also why i said "Especially when we have a better API".
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists