[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez0NQd1h8PvJbHmXsPu+K1s-fw97RXZiU4hRJ8U0MT7qaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 20:56:30 +0200
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: QiuXi <qiuxi1@...wei.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, xiekunxun@...wei.com,
young.liuyang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] coredump: fix memleak in dump_vma_snapshot()
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 4:04 AM QiuXi <qiuxi1@...wei.com> wrote:
> dump_vma_snapshot() allocs memory for *vma_meta, when dump_vma_snapshot()
> returns -EFAULT, the memory will be leaked, so we free it correctly.
The change itself looks reasonable to me.
> Fixes: a07279c9a8cd7 ("binfmt_elf, binfmt_elf_fdpic: use a VMA list snapshot")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v5.10
But I think this shouldn't be "Cc: stable". The patch only removes a
memory leak in a WARN_ON() path, and that WARN_ON() path can only be
taken if there is a kernel bug; if we reach this branch, there's a
good chance that kernel memory corruption has already occurred.
> Signed-off-by: QiuXi <qiuxi1@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/coredump.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> index 07afb5ddb1c4..19fe5312c10f 100644
> --- a/fs/coredump.c
> +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> @@ -1127,8 +1127,10 @@ int dump_vma_snapshot(struct coredump_params *cprm, int *vma_count,
>
> mmap_write_unlock(mm);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(i != *vma_count))
> + if (WARN_ON(i != *vma_count)) {
> + kvfree(*vma_meta);
> return -EFAULT;
> + }
>
> *vma_data_size_ptr = vma_data_size;
> return 0;
> --
> 2.12.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists