[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1810623.1628627327@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 21:28:47 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 045/138] mm/memcg: Add folio_memcg_lock() and folio_memcg_unlock()
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> These are the folio equivalents of lock_page_memcg() and
> unlock_page_memcg().
>
> lock_page_memcg() and unlock_page_memcg() have too many callers to be
> easily replaced in a single patch, so reimplement them as wrappers for
> now to be cleaned up later when enough callers have been converted to
> use folios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists