[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2n6WfsQUKP7W4VytJ6K=CGcfOz-eSc=6FzvkANWkk87A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:08:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: remove rtw_ioctl function
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:45 AM Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk> wrote:
> -int rtw_ioctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *rq, int cmd)
> -{
> - struct iwreq *wrq = (struct iwreq *)rq;
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - switch (cmd) {
> - case RTL_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT:
> - ret = wpa_supplicant_ioctl(dev, &wrq->u.data);
> - break;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE
> - case RTL_IOCTL_HOSTAPD:
> - ret = rtw_hostapd_ioctl(dev, &wrq->u.data);
> - break;
> -#endif /* CONFIG_88EU_AP_MODE */
> - case SIOCDEVPRIVATE:
> - ret = rtw_ioctl_wext_private(dev, &wrq->u);
> - break;
I think these functions are all defined 'static' in the same file, so
removing the
caller will cause a warning about an unused function. Better remove the
called functions along with the caller.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists