lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 09:34:57 +0000 From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk> CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>, Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>, Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>, Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>, Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: switchdev: zero-initialize struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info emitted by drivers towards the bridge On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:12:38AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > There's a difference between: > > struct foo bar = { 0 }; > > and > > struct foo bar = { }; > > The former tells the compiler that you wish to set the first member of > struct foo, which will be an integer type, to zero. The latter is an > empty initialiser where all members and sub-members of the structure > default to a zero value. > > You should have no problem with the latter. You will encounter problems > with the former if the first member of struct foo is not an integer > type. Ok, that's good to know. Seeing that this patch has not been applied yet I'll go for a v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists