[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXNAe3_TK-YWDwxjQ1uRMb0zLSSgx7w7FYCXvRmxG3pAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:56:12 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Chengming Gui <Jack.Gui@....com>, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-fixes tree
Hi Mark, Stephen,
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 6:11 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e00f543d3596 ("drm/amdgpu: add DID for beige goby")
>
> from the drm-fixes tree and commit:
>
> a8f706966b92 ("drm/amdgpu: add pci device id for cyan_skillfish")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> index 5ed8381ae0f5,d637b0536f84..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> @@@ -1213,13 -1212,9 +1212,16 @@@ static const struct pci_device_id pciid
> {0x1002, 0x740F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_ALDEBARAN|AMD_EXP_HW_SUPPORT},
> {0x1002, 0x7410, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_ALDEBARAN|AMD_EXP_HW_SUPPORT},
>
> + /* BEIGE_GOBY */
> + {0x1002, 0x7420, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BEIGE_GOBY},
> + {0x1002, 0x7421, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BEIGE_GOBY},
> + {0x1002, 0x7422, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BEIGE_GOBY},
> + {0x1002, 0x7423, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BEIGE_GOBY},
> + {0x1002, 0x743F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BEIGE_GOBY},
> +
> + /* CYAN_SKILLFISH */
> + {0x1002, 0x13FE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_CYAN_SKILLFISH|AMD_IS_APU},
> +
> {0, 0, 0}
> };
next-20210806 and later have a different resolution, duplicating the
BEIGE_GOBY entries before and after the CYAN_SKILLFISH entry.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists