lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 18:08:51 +0530 From: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.pkin@...il.com> To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>, Bin Luo <luobin9@...wei.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>, Derek Chickles <dchickles@...vell.com>, drivers@...sando.io, Felix Manlunas <fmanlunas@...vell.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, hariprasad <hkelam@...vell.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@...vell.com>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>, Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>, Satanand Burla <sburla@...vell.com>, Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>, Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>, Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>, Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Yisen Zhuang <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>, Prabhakar Kushwaha <pkushwaha@...vell.com>, Shai Malin <malin1024@...il.com>, Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>, rtoshniwal@...vell.com, Omkar Kulkarni <okulkarni@...vell.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] devlink: Set device as early as possible Hi Leon, On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:33 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote: > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> > > All kernel devlink implementations call to devlink_alloc() during > initialization routine for specific device which is used later as > a parent device for devlink_register(). > > Such late device assignment causes to the situation which requires us to > call to device_register() before setting other parameters, but that call > opens devlink to the world and makes accessible for the netlink users. > > Any attempt to move devlink_register() to be the last call generates the > following error due to access to the devlink->dev pointer. > > [ 8.758862] devlink_nl_param_fill+0x2e8/0xe50 > [ 8.760305] devlink_param_notify+0x6d/0x180 > [ 8.760435] __devlink_params_register+0x2f1/0x670 > [ 8.760558] devlink_params_register+0x1e/0x20 > > The simple change of API to set devlink device in the devlink_alloc() > instead of devlink_register() fixes all this above and ensures that > prior to call to devlink_register() everything already set. > > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com> > --- > .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c | 9 ++++--- > .../net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c | 5 ++-- > .../freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth-devlink.c | 5 ++-- > .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_devlink.c | 4 +-- > .../hisilicon/hns3/hns3vf/hclgevf_devlink.c | 7 ++--- > .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 8 +++--- > .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h | 4 +-- > .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c | 2 +- > .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 4 +-- > .../marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_devlink.c | 5 ++-- > .../marvell/prestera/prestera_devlink.c | 7 ++--- > .../marvell/prestera/prestera_devlink.h | 2 +- > .../ethernet/marvell/prestera/prestera_main.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/main.c | 4 +-- > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.c | 9 ++++--- > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/devlink.h | 4 +-- > .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 4 +-- > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/dev/driver.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 5 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c | 5 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main.c | 2 +- > .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c | 2 +- > .../ethernet/pensando/ionic/ionic_devlink.c | 4 +-- > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_devlink.c | 5 ++-- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 4 +-- > drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 4 +-- > drivers/net/netdevsim/dev.c | 4 +-- > drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 26 +++---------------- > drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 5 ++-- > include/net/devlink.h | 10 ++++--- > net/core/devlink.c | 15 +++++------ > net/dsa/dsa2.c | 5 ++-- > 33 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) > <snip> > > diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h > index ccbfb3a844aa..0236c77f2fd0 100644 > --- a/include/net/devlink.h > +++ b/include/net/devlink.h > @@ -1544,13 +1544,15 @@ struct net *devlink_net(const struct devlink *devlink); > * Drivers that operate on real HW must use devlink_alloc() instead. > */ > struct devlink *devlink_alloc_ns(const struct devlink_ops *ops, > - size_t priv_size, struct net *net); > + size_t priv_size, struct net *net, > + struct device *dev); > static inline struct devlink *devlink_alloc(const struct devlink_ops *ops, > - size_t priv_size) > + size_t priv_size, > + struct device *dev) > { > - return devlink_alloc_ns(ops, priv_size, &init_net); > + return devlink_alloc_ns(ops, priv_size, &init_net, dev); > } > -int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev); > +int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink); > void devlink_unregister(struct devlink *devlink); > void devlink_reload_enable(struct devlink *devlink); > void devlink_reload_disable(struct devlink *devlink); > diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c > index ee95eee8d0ed..d3b16dd9f64e 100644 > --- a/net/core/devlink.c > +++ b/net/core/devlink.c > @@ -8768,24 +8768,26 @@ static bool devlink_reload_actions_valid(const struct devlink_ops *ops) > * @ops: ops > * @priv_size: size of user private data > * @net: net namespace > + * @dev: parent device > * > * Allocate new devlink instance resources, including devlink index > * and name. > */ > struct devlink *devlink_alloc_ns(const struct devlink_ops *ops, > - size_t priv_size, struct net *net) > + size_t priv_size, struct net *net, > + struct device *dev) > { > struct devlink *devlink; > > - if (WARN_ON(!ops)) > - return NULL; > - > + WARN_ON(!ops || !dev); > if (!devlink_reload_actions_valid(ops)) > return NULL; > > devlink = kzalloc(sizeof(*devlink) + priv_size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!devlink) > return NULL; > + > + devlink->dev = dev; > devlink->ops = ops; > xa_init_flags(&devlink->snapshot_ids, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC); > write_pnet(&devlink->_net, net); > @@ -8810,12 +8812,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_alloc_ns); > * devlink_register - Register devlink instance > * > * @devlink: devlink > - * @dev: parent device > */ This patch is converting devlink_alloc() to devlink_alloc_register(). There are 2 APIs: devlink_alloc() and devlink_register(). Both APIs can be used in a scenario, Where devlink_alloc() can be done by code written around one struct dev and used by another struct dev. or This scenario is not even a valid scenario? > -int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink, struct device *dev) > +int devlink_register(struct devlink *devlink) > { > - WARN_ON(devlink->dev); > - devlink->dev = dev; > mutex_lock(&devlink_mutex); > list_add_tail(&devlink->list, &devlink_list); > devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW); Considering device registration has been moved to devlink_alloc(). Can the remaining code of devlink_register() be also moved in devlink_alloc()? --pk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists