[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL1PR12MB5286FFF1B2B421A2E37DDF44E8F79@BL1PR12MB5286.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:45:17 +0000
From: "Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna" <NaveenKrishna.Chatradhi@....com>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
CC: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] x86/amd_nb: Add Aldebaran device to PCI IDs
[Public]
Hi Yazen
-----Original Message-----
From: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2021 12:59 AM
To: Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna <NaveenKrishna.Chatradhi@....com>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org; x86@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; bp@...en8.de; mingo@...hat.com; mchehab@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] x86/amd_nb: Add Aldebaran device to PCI IDs
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 08:58:22PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> From: Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>
>
> Add Aldebaran device to the PCI ID database. Since this device has a
> configurable PCIe endpoint, it could be used with different drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@....com>
> ---
> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h index
> 4bac1831de80..d9aae90dfce9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> @@ -554,6 +554,7 @@
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M30H_DF_F3 0x1493 #define
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M60H_DF_F3 0x144b #define
> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_17H_M70H_DF_F3 0x1443
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F3 0x14d3
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_DF_F3 0x1653
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_19H_M50H_DF_F3 0x166d
> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_CNB17H_F3 0x1703
> --
The PCI ID looks right.
But I think this patch can be part of the next patch where this value is first used.
[naveenk:] Squashed this change into the 2nd patch and submitted v2 https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-edac/patch/20210806074350.114614-2-nchatrad@amd.com/
Thanks,
Yazen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists