linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/firmware: fix sysfb depends to prevent build failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:51:26 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        He Ying <heying24@...wei.com>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/firmware: fix sysfb depends to prevent build failures

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 6:42 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
<javierm@...hat.com> wrote:

> The Generic System Framebuffers support is built when the COMPILE_TEST
> option is enabled. But this wrongly assumes that all the architectures
> declare a struct screen_info.
>
> This is true for most architectures, but at least the following do not:
> arc, m68k, microblaze, openrisc, parisc and s390.
>
> By attempting to make this compile testeable on all architectures, it
> leads to linking errors as reported by the kernel test robot for parisc:
>
>   All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>      hppa-linux-ld: drivers/firmware/sysfb.o: in function `sysfb_init':
>      (.init.text+0x24): undefined reference to `screen_info'
>   >> hppa-linux-ld: (.init.text+0x28): undefined reference to `screen_info'
>
> To prevent these errors only allow sysfb to be built on systems that are
> going to need it, which are x86 BIOS and EFI.
>
> The EFI Kconfig symbol is used instead of (ARM || ARM64 || RISC) because
> some of these architectures only declare a struct screen_info if EFI is
> enabled. And also, because the sysfb code is only used for EFI on these
> architectures. For !EFI the "simple-framebuffer" device is registered by
> OF when parsing the Device Tree Blob (if a DT node for this is defined).
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

I don't know who picks up firmware patches though, I would send them
to soc@...nel.org if nothing else works.

Yours,
Linus Walleij