lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB3ZTACegVSUtMnjR8kLGKFJB04wu4wgD81gWKcXi2tBw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:33:36 +0200 From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Add NOHZ balancer flag for nohz.next_balance updates On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 12:31, Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> wrote: > > A following patch will trigger NOHZ idle balances as a means to update > nohz.next_balance. Vincent noted that blocked load updates can have > non-negligible overhead, which should be avoided if the intent is to only > update nohz.next_balance. > > Add a new NOHZ balance kick flag, NOHZ_NEXT_KICK. Gate NOHZ blocked load > update by the presence of NOHZ_STATS_KICK - currently all NOHZ balance > kicks will have the NOHZ_STATS_KICK flag set, so no change in behaviour is > expected. > > Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com> > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++--- > kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +++++++- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 11d22943753f..5c88698c3664 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -10506,7 +10506,8 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags, > * setting the flag, we are sure to not clear the state and not > * check the load of an idle cpu. > */ > - WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0); > + if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK) > + WRITE_ONCE(nohz.has_blocked, 0); > > /* > * Ensures that if we miss the CPU, we must see the has_blocked > @@ -10528,13 +10529,15 @@ static void _nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned int flags, > * balancing owner will pick it up. > */ > if (need_resched()) { > - has_blocked_load = true; > + if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK) > + has_blocked_load = true; > goto abort; > } > > rq = cpu_rq(balance_cpu); > > - has_blocked_load |= update_nohz_stats(rq); > + if (flags & NOHZ_STATS_KICK) > + has_blocked_load |= update_nohz_stats(rq); > > /* > * If time for next balance is due, You forgot to skip the update of nohz.next_blocked if NOHZ_STATS_KICK is not set: WRITE_ONCE(nohz.next_blocked, now + msecs_to_jiffies(LOAD_AVG_PERIOD)); > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > index 9a1c6aeb9165..b0f38b5d2550 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > @@ -2695,12 +2695,18 @@ extern void cfs_bandwidth_usage_dec(void); > #define NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK_BIT 0 > #define NOHZ_STATS_KICK_BIT 1 > #define NOHZ_NEWILB_KICK_BIT 2 > +#define NOHZ_NEXT_KICK_BIT 3 > > +/* Run rebalance_domains() */ > #define NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK BIT(NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK_BIT) > +/* Update blocked load */ > #define NOHZ_STATS_KICK BIT(NOHZ_STATS_KICK_BIT) > +/* Update blocked load when entering idle */ > #define NOHZ_NEWILB_KICK BIT(NOHZ_NEWILB_KICK_BIT) > +/* Update nohz.next_balance */ > +#define NOHZ_NEXT_KICK BIT(NOHZ_NEXT_KICK_BIT) > > -#define NOHZ_KICK_MASK (NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK | NOHZ_STATS_KICK) > +#define NOHZ_KICK_MASK (NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK | NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_NEXT_KICK) > > #define nohz_flags(cpu) (&cpu_rq(cpu)->nohz_flags) > > -- > 2.25.1 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists