lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:11:25 +0200 From: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com> To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com> Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Subject: Re: Questions re the new mount_setattr(2) manual page On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:12:14AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Christian, > > One more question... > > >> The propagation field is used to specify the propagation typ > >> of the mount or mount tree. Mount propagation options are > >> mutually exclusive; that is, the propagation values behave > >> like an enum. The supported mount propagation types are: > > The manual page text doesn't actually say it, but if the 'propagation' > field is 0, then this means leave the propagation type unchanged, > right? This of course should be mentioned in the manual page. Yes, if none of the documented values is set the propagation is unchanged. Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists