lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:37:16 +0800 From: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: x86: Allow CPU to force vendor-specific TDP level On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 02:47:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/08/21 13:00, Yu Zhang wrote: > > I guess it's because, unlike EPT which are with either 4 or 5 levels, NPT's > > level can range from 2 to 5, depending on the host paging mode... > > Yes, on Linux that will be one of 3/4/5 based on host paging mode, and it > will apply to all N_CR3... > > > But shadow EPT does not have such annoyance. Is above understanding correct? > > ... Right, because shadow EPT cannot have less than 4 levels, and it can > always use 4 levels if that's what L1 uses. Interesting. :) Thanks a lot for the explanation! B.R. Yu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists