[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162860841273.395.2362644052634240500.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:13:32 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5c8f23e6b73c13d9f7b52614783dcb9169883296
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5c8f23e6b73c13d9f7b52614783dcb9169883296
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:55:12 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:09:59 +02:00
posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor
Remove the ad-hoc timer base accessors and provide a consolidated one.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-6-frederic@kernel.org
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 4fbbbc8..0d91811 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -407,6 +407,17 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
return 0;
}
+static struct posix_cputimer_base *timer_base(struct k_itimer *timer,
+ struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ int clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
+
+ if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
+ return tsk->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
+ else
+ return tsk->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
+}
+
/*
* Dequeue the timer and reset the base if it was its earliest expiration.
* It makes sure the next tick recalculates the base next expiration so we
@@ -421,18 +432,11 @@ static void disarm_timer(struct k_itimer *timer, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
struct posix_cputimer_base *base;
- int clkidx;
if (!cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr))
return;
- clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
-
- if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
- base = p->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
- else
- base = p->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
-
+ base = timer_base(timer, p);
if (cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr) == base->nextevt)
base->nextevt = 0;
}
@@ -531,15 +535,9 @@ void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
*/
static void arm_timer(struct k_itimer *timer, struct task_struct *p)
{
- int clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
+ struct posix_cputimer_base *base = timer_base(timer, p);
struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
u64 newexp = cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr);
- struct posix_cputimer_base *base;
-
- if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
- base = p->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
- else
- base = p->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
if (!cpu_timer_enqueue(&base->tqhead, ctmr))
return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists