linux-kernel - [tip: timers/core] hrtimer: Avoid more SMP function calls in clock_was

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <162861133186.395.4745802282790716508.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:02:11 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] hrtimer: Avoid more SMP function calls in clock_was_set()

The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     1e7f7fbcd40c69d23e3fe641ead9f3dc128fa8aa
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/1e7f7fbcd40c69d23e3fe641ead9f3dc128fa8aa
Author:        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Tue, 13 Jul 2021 15:39:55 +02:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:57:23 +02:00

hrtimer: Avoid more SMP function calls in clock_was_set()

By unconditionally updating the offsets there are more indicators
whether the SMP function calls on clock_was_set() can be avoided:

  - When the offset update already happened on the remote CPU then the
    remote update attempt will yield the same seqeuence number and no
    IPI is required.

  - When the remote CPU is currently handling hrtimer_interrupt(). In
    that case the remote CPU will reevaluate the timer bases before
    reprogramming anyway, so nothing to do.

  - After updating it can be checked whether the first expiring timer in
    the affected clock bases moves before the first expiring (softirq)
    timer of the CPU. If that's not the case then sending the IPI is not
    required.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210713135158.887322464@linutronix.de

---
 kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 5d44c90..88aefc3 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -866,6 +866,68 @@ static void hrtimer_reprogram(struct hrtimer *timer, bool reprogram)
 	__hrtimer_reprogram(cpu_base, true, timer, expires);
 }
 
+static bool update_needs_ipi(struct hrtimer_cpu_base *cpu_base,
+			     unsigned int active)
+{
+	struct hrtimer_clock_base *base;
+	unsigned int seq;
+	ktime_t expires;
+
+	/*
+	 * Update the base offsets unconditionally so the following
+	 * checks whether the SMP function call is required works.
+	 *
+	 * The update is safe even when the remote CPU is in the hrtimer
+	 * interrupt or the hrtimer soft interrupt and expiring affected
+	 * bases. Either it will see the update before handling a base or
+	 * it will see it when it finishes the processing and reevaluates
+	 * the next expiring timer.
+	 */
+	seq = cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq;
+	hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the sequence did not change over the update then the
+	 * remote CPU already handled it.
+	 */
+	if (seq == cpu_base->clock_was_set_seq)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * If the remote CPU is currently handling an hrtimer interrupt, it
+	 * will reevaluate the first expiring timer of all clock bases
+	 * before reprogramming. Nothing to do here.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_base->in_hrtirq)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Walk the affected clock bases and check whether the first expiring
+	 * timer in a clock base is moving ahead of the first expiring timer of
+	 * @cpu_base. If so, the IPI must be invoked because per CPU clock
+	 * event devices cannot be remotely reprogrammed.
+	 */
+	active &= cpu_base->active_bases;
+
+	for_each_active_base(base, cpu_base, active) {
+		struct timerqueue_node *next;
+
+		next = timerqueue_getnext(&base->active);
+		expires = ktime_sub(next->expires, base->offset);
+		if (expires < cpu_base->expires_next)
+			return true;
+
+		/* Extra check for softirq clock bases */
+		if (base->clockid < HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC_SOFT)
+			continue;
+		if (cpu_base->softirq_activated)
+			continue;
+		if (expires < cpu_base->softirq_expires_next)
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Clock was set. This might affect CLOCK_REALTIME, CLOCK_TAI and
  * CLOCK_BOOTTIME (for late sleep time injection).
@@ -900,16 +962,10 @@ void clock_was_set(unsigned int bases)
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
-		/*
-		 * Only send the IPI when there are timers queued in one of
-		 * the affected clock bases. Otherwise update the base
-		 * remote to ensure that the next enqueue of a timer on
-		 * such a clock base will see the correct offsets.
-		 */
-		if (cpu_base->active_bases & bases)
+
+		if (update_needs_ipi(cpu_base, bases))
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask);
-		else
-			hrtimer_update_base(cpu_base);
+
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags);
 	}