[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8f07858-e8e7-9989-b95f-c512ba3904cf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 20:00:35 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dma-iommu: add SKIP_CPU_SYNC after syncing
On 2021-08-11 03:42, David Stevens wrote:
> From: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
>
> After syncing in map/unmap, add the DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC flag so
> anything that uses attrs later on will skip any sync work that has
> already been completed. In particular, this skips copying from the
> swiotlb twice during unmap.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 4f0cc4a0a61f..be0214b1455c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -859,8 +859,11 @@ static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
> static void iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
> size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> {
> - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
> iommu_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, dma_handle, size, dir);
> + attrs |= DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
> + }
> +
> __iommu_dma_unmap_swiotlb(dev, dma_handle, size, dir, attrs);
Again, fold that into here and put the arch sync in an else case to the
is_swiotlb_buffer() check.
> }
>
> @@ -999,8 +1002,10 @@ static int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> if (dev_is_untrusted(dev))
> return iommu_dma_map_sg_swiotlb(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
>
> - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
> iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_device(dev, sg, nents, dir);
> + attrs |= DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
> + }
Why? attrs is never referenced again after this.
> /*
> * Work out how much IOVA space we need, and align the segments to
> @@ -1068,8 +1073,10 @@ static void iommu_dma_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> struct scatterlist *tmp;
> int i;
>
> - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC))
> + if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC)) {
> iommu_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir);
> + attrs |= DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC;
> + }
Just move it down so it's out of the SWIOTLB path entirely. Exactly like
you did in patch #2 for map_sg, conspicuous in the hunk above.
Robin.
>
> if (dev_is_untrusted(dev)) {
> iommu_dma_unmap_sg_swiotlb(dev, sg, nents, dir, attrs);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists