[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bb543ebdf5458e90bff97698ee3a1cf69f89aa1.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 21:18:26 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev" <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 12/18] x86/pks: Add PKS fault callbacks
On Tue, 2021-08-03 at 21:32 -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> +static const pks_key_callback
> pks_key_callbacks[PKS_KEY_NR_CONSUMERS] = { 0 };
> +
> +bool handle_pks_key_callback(unsigned long address, bool write, u16
> key)
> +{
> + if (key > PKS_KEY_NR_CONSUMERS)
> + return false;
Good idea, should be >= though?
> +
> + if (pks_key_callbacks[key])
> + return pks_key_callbacks[key](address, write);
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
Otherwise, I've rebased on this series and didn't hit any problems.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists