linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress: Set CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0efe0c7b1c07591f07a905021f455b033441784f.1628659212.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 10:51:04 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: vexpress: Set CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag

Reuse the cpufreq core's registration of cooling device by setting the
CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag. Set this only if bL switcher isn't enabled.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
Sudeep, is this broken ? I wonder why we didn't do it earlier.

 drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 22 +++-------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
index 28c4c3254337..618b263434ca 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
-#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -47,7 +46,6 @@ static bool bL_switching_enabled;
 #define ACTUAL_FREQ(cluster, freq)  ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq << 1 : freq)
 #define VIRT_FREQ(cluster, freq)    ((cluster == A7_CLUSTER) ? freq >> 1 : freq)
 
-static struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev[MAX_CLUSTERS];
 static struct clk *clk[MAX_CLUSTERS];
 static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table[MAX_CLUSTERS + 1];
 static atomic_t cluster_usage[MAX_CLUSTERS + 1];
@@ -455,11 +453,6 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	struct device *cpu_dev;
 	int cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
 
-	if (cur_cluster < MAX_CLUSTERS) {
-		cpufreq_cooling_unregister(cdev[cur_cluster]);
-		cdev[cur_cluster] = NULL;
-	}
-
 	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(policy->cpu);
 	if (!cpu_dev) {
 		pr_err("%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n", __func__,
@@ -471,17 +464,6 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void ve_spc_cpufreq_ready(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
-	int cur_cluster = cpu_to_cluster(policy->cpu);
-
-	/* Do not register a cpu_cooling device if we are in IKS mode */
-	if (cur_cluster >= MAX_CLUSTERS)
-		return;
-
-	cdev[cur_cluster] = of_cpufreq_cooling_register(policy);
-}
-
 static struct cpufreq_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.name			= "vexpress-spc",
 	.flags			= CPUFREQ_HAVE_GOVERNOR_PER_POLICY |
@@ -492,7 +474,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver ve_spc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.get			= ve_spc_cpufreq_get_rate,
 	.init			= ve_spc_cpufreq_init,
 	.exit			= ve_spc_cpufreq_exit,
-	.ready			= ve_spc_cpufreq_ready,
 	.attr			= cpufreq_generic_attr,
 };
 
@@ -552,6 +533,9 @@ static int ve_spc_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CLUSTERS; i++)
 		mutex_init(&cluster_lock[i]);
 
+	if (!is_bL_switching_enabled())
+		ve_spc_cpufreq_driver.flags |= CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV;
+
 	ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&ve_spc_cpufreq_driver);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_info("%s: Failed registering platform driver: %s, err: %d\n",
-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514