linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 040/138] mm/memcg: Convert mem_cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 12:54:05 +0200
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 040/138] mm/memcg: Convert mem_cgroup_charge() to take
 a folio

On 7/15/21 5:35 AM, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Convert all callers of mem_cgroup_charge() to call page_folio() on the
> page they're currently passing in.  Many of them will be converted to
> use folios themselves soon.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>


Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>


> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c2ffad021e09..03283d97b62a 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6681,10 +6681,9 @@ void mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
>  			atomic_long_read(&parent->memory.children_low_usage)));
>  }
>  
> -static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> +static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct folio *folio, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  			       gfp_t gfp)

The git/next version also renames this function to charge_memcg(), why? The new
name doesn't look that internal as the old one. I don't have a strong opinion
but CCing memcg maintainers who might.

>  {
> -	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
>  	unsigned int nr_pages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -6697,27 +6696,27 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  
>  	local_irq_disable();
>  	mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(memcg, nr_pages);
> -	memcg_check_events(memcg, page_to_nid(page));
> +	memcg_check_events(memcg, folio_nid(folio));
>  	local_irq_enable();
>  out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>