linux-kernel - [PATCH V2 1/9] cpufreq: Auto-register with energy model if asked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 17:28:39 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
        Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/9] cpufreq: Auto-register with energy model if asked

Many cpufreq drivers register with the energy model for each policy and
do exactly the same thing. Follow the footsteps of thermal-cooling, to
get it done from the cpufreq core itself.

Provide a new callback, which will be called, if present, by the cpufreq
core at the right moment (more on that in the code's comment). Also
provide a generic implementation that uses dev_pm_opp_of_register_em().

This also allows us to register with the EM at a later point of time,
compared to ->init(), from where the EM core can access cpufreq policy
directly using cpufreq_cpu_get() type of helpers and perform other work,
like marking few frequencies inefficient, this will be done separately.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 14 ++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 06c526d66dd3..75974e7d6cc5 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1493,6 +1493,18 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 		write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Register with the energy model before sched_cpufreq_governor_change()
+	 * is called, which will result in rebuilding of the sched domains,
+	 * which should only be done once the energy model is properly
+	 * initialized for the policy first.
+	 *
+	 * Also, this should be called before the policy is registered with
+	 * cooling framework.
+	 */
+	if (cpufreq_driver->register_em)
+		cpufreq_driver->register_em(policy);
+
 	ret = cpufreq_init_policy(policy);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("%s: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: %d (%d)\n",
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 9fd719475fcd..1295621f6c28 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -9,10 +9,12 @@
 #define _LINUX_CPUFREQ_H
 
 #include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/kobject.h>
 #include <linux/notifier.h>
+#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
 #include <linux/pm_qos.h>
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
@@ -373,6 +375,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
 	/* platform specific boost support code */
 	bool		boost_enabled;
 	int		(*set_boost)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Set by drivers that want the core to automatically register the
+	 * policy's devices with Energy Model.
+	 */
+	void		(*register_em)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 };
 
 /* flags */
@@ -1046,4 +1054,10 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu);
 void cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table,
 		unsigned int transition_latency);
+
+static inline void cpufreq_register_em_with_opp(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+	dev_pm_opp_of_register_em(get_cpu_device(policy->cpu),
+				  policy->related_cpus);
+}
 #endif /* _LINUX_CPUFREQ_H */
-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514