[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210811121417.833987783@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: [patch V4 62/68] futex: Reorder sanity checks in futex_requeue()
No point in allocating memory when the input parameters are bogus. Validate
all parameters before proceeding.
Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
V4: New patch
---
kernel/futex.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1934,13 +1934,6 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uad
return -EINVAL;
/*
- * requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
- * without any locks in case it fails.
- */
- if (refill_pi_state_cache())
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- /*
* futex_requeue() allows the caller to define the number
* of waiters to wake up via the @nr_wake argument. With
* REQUEUE_PI waking up more than one waiter is creating
@@ -1963,6 +1956,13 @@ static int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uad
*/
if (nr_wake != 1)
return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
+ * without any locks in case it fails.
+ */
+ if (refill_pi_state_cache())
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
retry:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists