[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877dgsp2vp.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 14:44:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: brookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource: skip check while watchdog hung up or
unstable
On Wed, Aug 11 2021 at 17:55, brookxu wrote:
> From: Chunguang Xu <brookxu@...cent.com>
>
> After patch 1f45f1f3 (clocksource: Make clocksource validation work
> for all clocksources), md_nsec may be 0 in some scenarios, such as
> the watchdog is delayed for a long time or the watchdog has a
> time-warp.
Maybe 0? There is exactly one single possibility for it to be zero:
cs->wd_last == wdnow, i.e. delta = 0 -> wd_nsec = 0
So how does that condition solve any long delay or wrap around of the
watchdog? It's more than unlikely to hit exactly this case where the
readout is identical to the previous readout unless the watchdog stopped
counting.
> We found a problem when testing nvme disks with fio, when multiple
> queue interrupts of a disk were mapped to a single CPU. IO interrupt
> processing will cause the watchdog to be delayed for a long time
> (155 seconds), the system reports TSC unstable and switches the clock
If you hold off the softirq from running for 155 seconds then the TSC
watchdog is the least of your problems.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists