linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wwan: core: Unshadow error code returned by ida_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 15:50:30 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] wwan: core: Unshadow error code returned by
 ida_alloc_range))

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:35:04PM +0300, Sergey Ryazanov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 5:20 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 5:14 PM Sergey Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@...il.com> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 12:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
> >> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>> ida_alloc_range)) may return other than -ENOMEM error code.
> >>> Unshadow it in the wwan_create_port().
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> >>
> >> A small nitpick, looks like "ida_alloc_range))" in the description is
> >> a typo and should be "ida_alloc_range()". Besides this:
> >
> > Shall I resend?
> 
> Yes, please. And specify the target tree in the subject, please. See
> patchwork warning [1, 2]. The first patch is a clear bug fix, so it
> should be targeted to the 'net' tree, while the second patch despite
> its usefulness could not be considered a bug fix, so it should be
> targeted to the 'net-next' tree. Subjects could be like this:
> 
> [PATCHv3 net 1/2] wwan: core: Avoid returning NULL from wwan_create_dev()
> [PATCHv3 net-next 2/2] wwan: core: Unshadow error code returned by
> ida_alloc_range()
> 
> Or since the second patch is not depends on the first one and patches
> target different trees, patches could be submitted independently:
> 
> [PATCHv3 net] wwan: core: Avoid returning NULL from wwan_create_dev()
> [PATCHv3 net-next] wwan: core: Unshadow error code returned by ida_alloc_range()

Split and sent separately, thanks!

> 1. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210806085413.61536-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/
> 2. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210806085413.61536-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko