[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VdjTYvLmKfGONCZhpbyrzM_tG7uXkm5==-X6-uO1gTVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:40:59 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5682: Properly turn off regulators if wrong
device ID
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 9:24 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > @@ -156,6 +163,10 @@ static int rt5682_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
> > dev_err(&i2c->dev, "Failed to request supplies: %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> Nit: Add newline here.
How strongly do you feel about it? I purposely left the newline off to
try to tie the devm_add_action_or_reset() more closely to the
devm_regulator_bulk_get(). I wanted to make it more obvious that the
two of them were "together" and shouldn't be split up. That being
said, it's no skin off my teeth to add a newline if everyone likes it
better. ;-)
> > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&i2c->dev, rt5682_i2c_disable_regulators,
> > + rt5682);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists