[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABk29NuoSxJnVb8jdGB6n=zM9fxF4=kU9oAU-a37Mz5h+zS7vA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 14:17:28 -0700
From: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Luigi Rizzo <lrizzo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc/uptime.c: fix idle time reporting in /proc/uptime
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 1:42 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Not sure why you moved get_idle_time() in kernel/sched/cputime.c
>
> For builds where CONFIG_PROC_FS is not set, this function is not used/needed.
Consolidate the kernel idle accounting code; seemed a little strange
to have this implemented in proc/stat.c, especially if it also needed
to be used elsewhere.
Does a __maybe_unused/#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS seem reasonable, or would
you advocate leaving it in fs/proc?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists