[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc5d4268-2304-5c1d-8311-24d141cb5ced@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:11:39 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
James E J Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/15] pci: Consolidate pci_iomap* and pci_iomap*wc
> Why is it safe to make pci_iomap_wc_range() support IO ports when it
> didn't before? That might be desirable, but I think it *is* a
> functional change here.
None of the callers use it to map IO ports, so it will be a no-op for
them. But you're right, it's a (minor) functional change.
-Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists