[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mhng-48d9e47f-a43b-4dac-808c-61078c2b77d9@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 22:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: alex@...ti.fr
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes 3/3] riscv: Optimize kernel virtual address conversion macro
On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 12:31:24 PDT (-0700), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
> Le 7/08/2021 à 18:36, Palmer Dabbelt a écrit :
>> On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 00:59:37 PDT (-0700), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
>>> The current test in kernel_mapping_va_to_pa only applies when
>>> CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL is set, so use IS_ENABLED to optimize this macro at
>>> compile-time in standard kernels that do not require this test.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>
>>> ---
>>> arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
>>> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
>>> index b0ca5058e7ae..10dc063868f6 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
>>> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base;
>>> #define linear_mapping_va_to_pa(x) ((unsigned long)(x) -
>>> kernel_map.va_pa_offset)
>>> #define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({ \
>>> unsigned long _y = y; \
>>> - (_y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \
>>> + (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr +
>>> XIP_OFFSET) ? \
>>> ((unsigned long)(_y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset)
>>> : \
>>> ((unsigned long)(_y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset -
>>> XIP_OFFSET); \
>>> })
>>
>> IIUC this isn't actually a fix? The other two are, though, so they're
>> on fixes.
>
> Indeed this is not a fix, this is symmetrical to what I have done in
> patch 1 so that seemed natural to land in the same patchset. Let me know
> if you want me to resend it on its own.
That's fine, it was just explicitly called out as a fix in the subject
line so I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something. This is on
for-next.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists