[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRTTZU3Pzm/1tH9M@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:53:09 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter H Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] x86/tdx: Add protected guest support for TDX
guest
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 04:00:18PM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> Boris, how do you want to proceed? Do you want me to implement intel_prot_guest_has()
> or change comparison log to TDX specific?
Yes, the idea was to have the generic call prot_guest_has() call
into the vendor one. This way each vendor is free to do whatever it
desires in its own version and callers simply need to call the generic
interface.
> > Given amd_prot_guest_has(), my guess is Boris intended intel_prot_guest_has()...
Yap, exactly.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists