linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] mm: Fix NFS swapfiles and use DIO read for swapfiles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <162876946134.3068428.15475611190876694695.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:57:41 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     willy@...radead.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, trond.myklebust@...marydata.com,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com, hch@....de, jlayton@...nel.org,
        sfrench@...ba.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Fix NFS swapfiles and use DIO read for swapfiles


Hi Willy, Trond,

Here's a change to make reads from the swapfile use async DIO rather than
readpage(), as requested by Willy.

Whilst trying to make this work, I found that NFS's support for swapfiles
seems to have been non-functional since Aug 2019 (I think), so the first
patch fixes that.  Question is: do we actually *want* to keep this
functionality, given that it seems that no one's tested it with an upstream
kernel in the last couple of years?

I tested this using the procedure and program outlined in the first patch.

I also encountered occasional instances of the following warning, so I'm
wondering if there's a scheduling problem somewhere:

BUG: workqueue lockup - pool cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 stuck for 34s!
Showing busy workqueues and worker pools:
workqueue events: flags=0x0
  pwq 6: cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=2
    in-flight: 1565:fill_page_cache_func
workqueue events_highpri: flags=0x10
  pwq 3: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=-20 active=1/256 refcnt=2
    in-flight: 1547:fill_page_cache_func
  pwq 1: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=-20 active=1/256 refcnt=2
    in-flight: 1811:fill_page_cache_func
workqueue events_unbound: flags=0x2
  pwq 8: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 active=3/512 refcnt=5
    pending: fsnotify_connector_destroy_workfn, fsnotify_mark_destroy_workfn, cleanup_offline_cgwbs_workfn
workqueue events_power_efficient: flags=0x82
  pwq 8: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 active=4/256 refcnt=6
    pending: neigh_periodic_work, neigh_periodic_work, check_lifetime, do_cache_clean
workqueue writeback: flags=0x4a
  pwq 8: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 active=1/256 refcnt=4
    in-flight: 433(RESCUER):wb_workfn
workqueue rpciod: flags=0xa
  pwq 8: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 active=38/256 refcnt=40
    in-flight: 7:rpc_async_schedule, 1609:rpc_async_schedule, 1610:rpc_async_schedule, 912:rpc_async_schedule, 1613:rpc_async_schedule, 1631:rpc_async_schedule, 34:rpc_async_schedule, 44:rpc_async_schedule
    pending: rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule, rpc_async_schedule
workqueue ext4-rsv-conversion: flags=0x2000a
pool 1: cpus=0 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=-20 hung=59s workers=2 idle: 6
pool 3: cpus=1 node=0 flags=0x1 nice=-20 hung=43s workers=2 manager: 20
pool 6: cpus=3 node=0 flags=0x0 nice=0 hung=0s workers=3 idle: 498 29
pool 8: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=0 hung=34s workers=9 manager: 1623
pool 9: cpus=0-3 flags=0x5 nice=-20 hung=0s workers=2 manager: 5224 idle: 859

Note that this is due to DIO writes to NFS only, as far as I can tell, and
that no reads had happened yet.

David
---
David Howells (2):
      nfs: Fix write to swapfile failure due to generic_write_checks()
      mm: Make swap_readpage() for SWP_FS_OPS use ->direct_IO() not ->readpage()


 mm/page_io.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)