linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] kasan: test: avoid writing invalid memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:02:20 +0200
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] kasan: test: avoid writing invalid memory

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 10:57 AM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 21:21, <andrey.konovalov@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
> >
> > Multiple KASAN tests do writes past the allocated objects or writes to
> > freed memory. Turn these writes into reads to avoid corrupting memory.
> > Otherwise, these tests might lead to crashes with the HW_TAGS mode, as it
> > neither uses quarantine nor redzones.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
>
> although if you need a write primitive somewhere that doesn't corrupt
> memory, you could use atomic_add() or atomic_or() of 0. Although
> technically that's a read-modify-write.

Interesting idea. I'd say let's keep the volatile reads for now, and
change them if we encounter any problem with those.

> For generic mode one issue is
> that these are explicitly instrumented and not through the compiler,
> which is only a problem if you're testing the compiler emits the right
> instrumentation.

On a related point, it seems we have no KASAN tests to check atomic operations.

Filed https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214055 for this.

Thanks!