[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V8RjS3+3L=_NxeuE8vGoFpPnK2NP+QT9WUYExDG_GY-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 09:54:58 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Avoid creating multiple connectors
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> If we created our own connector because the driver does not support the
> NO_CONNECTOR flag, we don't want the downstream bridge to *also* create
> a connector. And if this driver did pass the NO_CONNECTOR flag (and we
> supported that mode) this would change nothing.
>
> Fixes: 4e5763f03e10 ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Wrap panel with panel-bridge")
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
I'm going to apply this one to drm-misc/drm-misc-next and push since
it's a fix and we're before -rc6, then I'll take a look at the later
patches in the series.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists