lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 20:03:26 +0300 From: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com> To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pali@...nel.org, dsterba@...e.cz, aaptel@...e.com, willy@...radead.org, rdunlap@...radead.org, joe@...ches.com, mark@...mstone.com, nborisov@...e.com, linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, anton@...era.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com, hch@....de, ebiggers@...nel.org, andy.lavr@...il.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name Subject: Re: [PATCH v27 00/10] NTFS read-write driver GPL implementation by Paragon Software On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 11:23:16PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 09:24:59AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > I have the same (still unanswered) questions as last time: > > > > 1. What happens when you run ntfs3 through fstests with '-g all'? I get > > that the pass rate isn't going to be as high with ntfs3 as it is with > > ext4/xfs/btrfs, but fstests can be adapted (see the recent attempts to > > get exfat under test). > > Indeed, it's not that hard at all. I've included a patch to > xfstests-bld[1] so that you can just run "kvm-xfstests -c ntfs3 -g > auto". > > Konstantin, I would *strongly* encourage you to try running fstests, > about 60 seconds into a run, we discover that generic/013 will trigger > locking problems that could lead to deadlocks. It seems at least at my testing that if acl option is used then generic/013 will pass. I have tested this with old linux-next commit 5a4cee98ea757e1a2a1354b497afdf8fafc30a20 I have still some of my own code in it but I will test this tomorrow so I can be sure. It also seems that acl support is broken. I also suspect ntfs-3g mkfs in some failure cases. So maybe ntfs-3g mkfs will give different result than Paragons mkfs. It would be nice to test with Paragons mkfs software or that Paragon will test with ntfs-3g.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists