[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U__Ge_6MkvxmcOQe49Q7NG94Bi3T2xNNiec-NF9J8tJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:23:15 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement bridge->mode_valid()
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:51 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
>
> For the brave new world of bridges not creating their own connectors, we
> need to implement the max clock limitation via bridge->mode_valid()
> instead of connector->mode_valid().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
This looks good to me. I'll plan to land this together with the next
patch into drm-misc-next sometime next week unless someone beats me to
it.
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists