linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't step down in the TDP iterator when zapping all SPTEs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a95b2f6-a7ad-5101-baa5-6a19194695a3@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:38:43 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't step down in the TDP iterator
 when zapping all SPTEs

On 12/08/21 19:33, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 12/08/21 19:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>> Yeah, I was/am on the fence too, I almost included a blurb in the cover letter
>>> saying as much.  I'll do that for v2 and let Paolo decide.
>>
>> I think it makes sense to have it.  You can even use the ternary operator
> 
> Hah, yeah, I almost used a ternary op.  Honestly don't know why I didn't, guess
> my brain flipped a coin.
> 
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * When zapping everything, all entries at the top level
>> 	 * ultimately go away, and the levels below go down with them.
>> 	 * So do not bother iterating all the way down to the leaves.
> 
> The subtle part is that try_step_down() won't actually iterate down because it
> explicitly rereads and rechecks the SPTE.
> 
> 	if (iter->level == iter->min_level)
> 		return false;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Reread the SPTE before stepping down to avoid traversing into page
> 	 * tables that are no longer linked from this entry.
> 	 */
> 	iter->old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter->sptep));  \
>                                                                       ---> this is the code that is avoided
> 	child_pt = spte_to_child_pt(iter->old_spte, iter->level);   /
> 	if (!child_pt)
> 		return false;

Ah, right - so I agree with Ben that it's not too important.

Paolo