[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22130c0e-5966-f76d-5ce1-f92ec4750155@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 01:29:05 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux@...pel-privat.de,
himadrispandya@...il.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+a631ec9e717fb0423053@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: asix: fix uninit value in asix_mdio_read
On 8/14/21 1:23 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 07:01:08PM +0300, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> Syzbot reported uninit-value in asix_mdio_read(). The problem was in
>> missing error handling. asix_read_cmd() should initialize passed stack
>> variable smsr, but it can fail in some cases. Then while condidition
>> checks possibly uninit smsr variable.
>>
>> Since smsr is uninitialized stack variable, driver can misbehave,
>> because smsr will be random in case of asix_read_cmd() failure.
>> Fix it by adding error cheking and just continue the loop instead of
>> checking uninit value.
>>
>> Fixes: 8a46f665833a ("net: asix: Avoid looping when the device is disconnected")
>> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+a631ec9e717fb0423053@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
>> index ac92bc52a85e..572ca3077f8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/asix_common.c
>> @@ -479,7 +479,13 @@ int asix_mdio_read(struct net_device *netdev, int phy_id, int loc)
>> usleep_range(1000, 1100);
>> ret = asix_read_cmd(dev, AX_CMD_STATMNGSTS_REG,
>> 0, 0, 1, &smsr, 0);
>> - } while (!(smsr & AX_HOST_EN) && (i++ < 30) && (ret != -ENODEV));
>> + if (ret == -ENODEV) {
>> + break;
>> + } else if (ret < 0) {
>> + ++i;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + } while (!(smsr & AX_HOST_EN) && (i++ < 30));
>
> No ret < 0, don't you end up with a double increment of i? So it will
> only retry 15 times, not 30?
>
> Humm.
>
> If ret < 0 is true, smsr is uninitialized? The continue statement
> causes a jump into the condition expression, where we evaluate smsr &
> AX_HOST_EN. Isn't this just as broken as the original version?
>
> Andrew
>
Yes, you are right, I missed that, sorry. I will rewrote this loop into
for loop in v2.
Im wondering why this wrong patch passed KMSAN testing...
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists