linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: tcrypt - Fix the wrong position of return value test statement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30de4d0a-42ee-3115-981e-bedc701bceb8@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 15:38:18 +0800
From:   Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jia Zhang <zhang.jia@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "YiLin . Li" <YiLin.Li@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: tcrypt - Fix the wrong position of return
 value test statement

Hi Vitaly,

On 8/12/21 9:59 PM, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> Tianjia,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 09:17:46PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>> The position of the return value test statement of crypto_aead_setkey()
>> is wrong, adjust to make it work properly.
> 
> This commit message does not explain anything. It's nearly equivalent to
> "fix".
> 

will update in next version.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   crypto/tcrypt.c | 13 ++++++-------
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> index d73a42fdaa9b..73c97e085baf 100644
>> --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c
>> @@ -612,6 +612,12 @@ static void test_aead_speed(const char *algo, int enc, unsigned int secs,
>>   				}
>>   			}
>>   			ret = crypto_aead_setkey(tfm, key, *keysize);
> 
> Perhaps, you would say that return value of crypto_aead_setkey was lost.
> 

Yes, good idea.

>> +			if (ret) {
>> +				pr_err("setkey() failed flags=%x\n",
>> +						crypto_aead_get_flags(tfm));
>> +				goto out;
>> +			}
>> +
>>   			ret = crypto_aead_setauthsize(tfm, authsize);
> 
> But, isn't now return value of crypto_aead_setauthsize is lost?
> 
> Thanks,
> 

Yes, it is needed.

I will move crypto_aead_setauthsize() call out of the loop, only need to 
call it once after load transform.

Best regards,
Tianjia

>>   
>>   			iv_len = crypto_aead_ivsize(tfm);
>> @@ -622,15 +628,8 @@ static void test_aead_speed(const char *algo, int enc, unsigned int secs,
>>   			printk(KERN_INFO "test %u (%d bit key, %d byte blocks): ",
>>   					i, *keysize * 8, bs);
>>   
>> -
>>   			memset(tvmem[0], 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>>   
>> -			if (ret) {
>> -				pr_err("setkey() failed flags=%x\n",
>> -						crypto_aead_get_flags(tfm));
>> -				goto out;
>> -			}
>> -
>>   			sg_init_aead(sg, xbuf, bs + (enc ? 0 : authsize),
>>   				     assoc, aad_size);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7